Preparedness

Security Guard’s Split-Second Decision Vindicated in Deadly Encounter

Published

on

In a recent incident in Aurora, Colorado, a security guard found himself in a life-threatening situation when a man placed a gun to the back of his head outside a 7-Eleven. The confrontation, which occurred around 9 p.m. on August 31, ended with the security guard fatally shooting the assailant. After a thorough investigation, prosecutors have decided not to charge the guard, citing self-defense.

The incident unfolded when Vernon Dorsey approached the security guard, who was patrolling in front of the convenience store. Dorsey, armed with a handgun, demanded that the guard surrender his weapon and threatened to kill him. This led to a struggle between the two men as Dorsey attempted to disarm the guard.

In the heat of the moment, the guard managed to retain control of his firearm and shot Dorsey in the chest. When law enforcement arrived at the scene, they discovered Dorsey suffering from a gunshot wound. Tragically, he later succumbed to his injuries. Dorsey was 36 years old.

Following a comprehensive review of the evidence, both the District Attorney’s Office and the Aurora Police Department concluded that the security guard’s actions were justified as self-defense. The police had initially suspected the same, taking the guard in for questioning but recognizing the circumstances he faced.

Iron Spear Protection Group LLC, the company providing security services for 7-Eleven, expressed unwavering support for their employee. They stated their backing with “absolute certainty” after evaluating the situation. The company’s president assured that the guard was recovering well and spending time with his family.

Public reaction to the incident has largely been supportive of the guard’s actions. Comments on social media reflected this sentiment, with one user stating, “Good work, sir, here is a raise,” while another added, “He did his job, and he defended himself in the process.”

This case underscores the complexities and dangers faced by security personnel, often requiring split-second decisions that can have life-altering consequences.


Do you believe security guards should have the right to use lethal force if they feel their life is in immediate danger?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

DA releases video, says Aurora 7-Eleven security guard shot in self defense

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

4 Comments

  1. Old Man

    November 10, 2024 at 1:00 pm

    The shooter, Dorsey suffered from a gunshot wound. Tragically, he later succumbed to his injuries. “Tragically”? I say “Good riddance”!

  2. Joan

    November 10, 2024 at 1:45 pm

    I totally agree. He caused his own death. What the tragidy is, is that he was brought up to think he could get away, which this nonsense.

  3. CPO Bill

    November 10, 2024 at 11:13 pm

    The Officer was left with little choice! He did what he had to do to protect himself and others!

  4. Paul

    November 11, 2024 at 8:01 pm

    One less piece of shit on the earth taking up oxygen! Good riddance, we need more outcomes like this for punks that don’t deserve to be here! Good shoot for the guard, hope he comes out alright!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version