Connect with us

Preparedness

Self-Defense Ruling in Detroit Tailgate Shooting Sparks Controversy

Published

on

A concealed carrier involved in a fatal incident at a Detroit Lions tailgate won’t face charges, as the Wayne County Prosecutor has declared the shooting an act of self-defense. The incident, which took place at the Eastern Market, was captured on cellphone video and involved a confrontation that escalated quickly.

Jalen Welch, the assailant, allegedly pulled a gun and threatened a 40-year-old man, who is a legal concealed pistol owner. In response, the 40-year-old fired a single shot that struck Welch in the head, fatally wounding him.

Tragically, the same bullet also hit an innocent bystander, RayShawn Palmer, who was also killed.

Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy stated, “In this case, the shooter was not involved with the physical altercation, or any crime, when Mr. Welch pulled out his weapon and threatened him with deadly force.”

“It is only then that the shooter drew his weapon and fired one-time striking Mr. Welch, and unfortunately striking Mr. Palmer,” Worthy added. “A thorough review of the facts and evidence shows that the shooter acted in lawful self-defense. The shooting was justified. There is insufficient evidence to charge the shooter with any crime.”

The shooter’s attorney expressed relief over the decision.

“My client is very pleased he is not being charged with a crime; it was agonizing sitting in jail for three days awaiting the decision,” the attorney told WJBK-TV.

“He is dealing with a lot of emotions. He feels terrible for the family of the bystander and wishes to extend his condolences, but he is grateful to return to his family. His right to exercise to protect his life and others is absolute. He did nothing to forfeit that right.”

Despite the ruling, Palmer’s family is devastated and angry that no charges are being filed against the shooter.

“This is unbelievable that an individual shoots someone — even though he had a CPL — in an environment like this,” said Jermaine Little, Palmer’s brother. “It could have been a 5-year-old. Unfortunately, it was my brother, and so my whole family is here. We are grieving. We are hurt, and we want some answers.”

Little continued, “Our brother’s gone. This is an individual that wanted to give back, did give back, loved his family, was not a violent person, loved to dance. Just wanted to entertain and for this to happen, for trying to stop something that was happening, it’s unacceptable.”

Palmer’s family has vowed to challenge the no-charges ruling.

“We’re not going to give up,” Little noted. “If we got to get out here every day, if we got to post things, if we got to march — whatever we got to do. We just want some answers. Give us some answers.”

This incident highlights the complexities and emotional toll of self-defense cases, especially when innocent lives are lost.


What is your primary concern regarding incidents involving concealed carry and self-defense?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Don

    September 30, 2024 at 1:34 pm

    I guess the shooter wasn’t white.

  2. Jack B. Nimble

    September 30, 2024 at 1:36 pm

    Although it was a tragic event, ultimately it was an accident. Your brother is the victim of colateral damage. Quite unfortunate. What do you want from this guy? Do you want to sue him for defending himself? Do you want him to go to jail for defending himself? Is this going to bring your brother back?

  3. Paul

    September 30, 2024 at 4:52 pm

    Why are they not going after the assailant, because he already got what he deserved! Now blaim the guy who was defending himself? Had the punk who was the instigator not pulled a firearm , everyone would be alive! Then people want to know why others are afraid to get involved! Then again, it’s Detroit, another dumbasscrat run shit hole!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Preparedness

Homeowner’s Quick Action Saves Family from Intruder’s Threats

Published

on

In a recent incident in La Luz, New Mexico, a homeowner was forced to defend his family when an intruder broke into his residence. According to the New Mexico State Police, the event unfolded on a Saturday when Lucas Moore, aged 45, unlawfully entered the home and posed a threat to the homeowner.

Authorities received reports of gunfire from the property on Appler Rd., located near Alamogordo. Upon arrival, they discovered Moore deceased in the kitchen area.

The homeowner recounted the harrowing experience, stating that Moore had forced entry into the home and issued threats. Despite being ordered to leave, Moore allegedly persisted in his threatening behavior, compelling the homeowner to take defensive action.

“The young children were asleep in their beds during the altercation and were unharmed,” police reports confirm. The homeowner’s quick response ensured the safety of his wife and their three children, who remained unharmed throughout the ordeal.

Following the incident, the homeowner promptly contacted emergency services. He informed the authorities that Moore had forcefully banged on the door before breaking it open to gain entry. Despite paramedics’ efforts to revive Moore, he was pronounced dead at the scene.

Currently, no charges have been filed against the homeowner. However, the police investigation is still ongoing, and the case will be forwarded to the district attorney’s office for further review upon completion.

La Luz, a small community with a population of approximately 1,615, is situated in the south-central region of New Mexico. This incident has undoubtedly shaken the local residents, highlighting the importance of home security and self-defense.


Do you believe homeowners should have the right to use firearms to defend themselves against intruders in their homes?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Unraveling the Madison School Shooting’s California Connection

Published

on

The recent developments in the Madison school shooting case have added layers of complexity to an already perplexing incident. Law enforcement officials have unveiled new details that further cloud the understanding of the motives behind the tragic event at a Christian private school in Madison, Wisconsin.

The FBI has taken into custody 20-year-old Alexander Paffendorf from Carlsbad, California. This action followed the discovery of messages exchanged between Paffendorf and Natalie Rupnow, a 15-year-old who is accused of killing two individuals at Abundant Life Christian School.

Alex Gallegos, a neighbor, remarked on the intensity of the situation during the law enforcement operation in Carlsbad:
“They had their full guns out all over the street. There were cop cars. I’d say about 15 cops here.”

During questioning, Paffendorf reportedly confessed to plotting a mass shooting at a government facility, intending to use both explosives and firearms. This revelation is supported by a report from the Carlsbad Police Department, which details the man’s intentions.

The legal system has responded swiftly, with a judge issuing a restraining order earlier this week, as reported by KFMB-TV. Witnesses in the neighborhood observed a significant law enforcement presence at Paffendorf’s residence, noting the seizure of a black gun box.

“I didn’t see them arrest anybody, but they gave high-fives as it came to an end,” Gallegos added.
“It sounds pretty wild and scary that this could happen so close to home.”

The tragic events in Madison resulted in the death of one student and one teacher, with five others sustaining critical injuries. Rupnow, who had adopted the name “Samantha,” ultimately took her own life after the shooting spree.

Authorities have shared insights into Rupnow’s troubled background, highlighting the instability caused by her parents’ repeated separations and reconciliations. Her social media activity reportedly showed an unsettling admiration for previous school shooters, adding another layer of complexity to her actions.

As the investigation continues, the community remains on edge, grappling with the shock and confusion surrounding these intertwined events.


What should be the primary focus of policy changes to address incidents like the Madison school shooting and the alleged plot in California?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Florida Homeowner Defends Family, Stops Intruder with a Single Shot

Published

on

In Lake Wales, Florida, a homeowner found himself in a tense situation after an alleged intruder entered his residence. The incident unfolded just after 11:30 p.m. when the homeowner was alerted by his dogs barking, signaling something was amiss.

Upon investigating the disturbance, the homeowner discovered 34-year-old Cameron McGuire inside his home. McGuire was allegedly in possession of some of the homeowner’s child’s belongings, which heightened the situation’s severity.

Confronting the intruder, the homeowner commanded McGuire to “freeze.” However, McGuire continued advancing toward him, prompting the homeowner to fire a shot. The bullet struck McGuire in the leg, effectively incapacitating him.

Afterward, the homeowner held McGuire at gunpoint until law enforcement arrived on the scene. Lake Wales Police Chief Chris Velasquez remarked on the homeowner’s actions, stating, “This homeowner is a law-abiding citizen and had every right to protect his family.”

Chief Velasquez further noted, “Cameron McGuire should be thankful today that he is alive and in jail. Hopefully, this was his wake-up call.” These words underscore the gravity of the situation and the potential consequences of McGuire’s actions.

It was revealed that McGuire had been released from a Florida prison in February and possesses an extensive criminal record. This background information adds context to the homeowner’s decision to act in defense of his home and family.


Do you believe homeowners should have the right to use firearms to defend their property against intruders?

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

" "