Connect with us

Preparedness

Armed Driver Fights Back, Turns Tables on Would-Be Robber

Published

on

Late Sunday evening, a shocking incident unfolded on the streets of Glendale, California. Authorities reported that a 37-year-old man, armed and intent on robbery, approached two individuals sitting in an SUV. The plan took a fatal turn for the worse when the driver, also armed, decided to fight back and shot the would-be robber.

Glendale law enforcement arrived on the scene, in the 200 block of East Dryden Street, shortly after 10:40 p.m. There, they found a man lying in the road, suffering from a gunshot wound.

“If somebody finds themselves in a situation where their life is in danger or someone else’s life is in danger, I as a … community member, as a citizen, would do whatever I could to protect myself and anybody else.”

The man was identified as Edward Mazon by the Los Angeles County coroner’s office on Tuesday. Law enforcement pieced together the events, confirming that Mazon had tried to rob the pair in the SUV. The driver fired his weapon in response to the threat, reportedly shooting Mazon, then subsequently leaving the scene.

Tragically, Mazon was pronounced dead at the scene. The search is on to find the two individuals from the SUV. Contrastingly, they are not being pursued as murder suspects, but rather as victims of attempted robbery.

“Everything’s possible, but at this point, it appears that they are victims.” Sgt. Vahe Abramyan, a spokesperson for the Glendale Police Department, told KNBC.

Witnesses to the shocking incident flooded the 911 line with calls. Over a dozen onlookers watched as paramedics tried desperately to resuscitate Mazon in the middle of Dryden Street near Brand Boulevard.

Resident Terri Robertson described the scene, “I saw the EMT do the chest compressions, like furiously, [I] had no idea what was going on. And then a minute later, they’re covering him with a sheet.”

Robertson expressed support for the victims, stating that in a situation where they were held at gunpoint, it was right to fight back. “I would say they have to, because crime is getting really crazy everywhere.”

Abramyan reiterated this sentiment, stating, “if somebody finds themselves in a situation where their life is in danger or someone else’s life is in danger, I as a… community member, as a citizen, would do whatever I could to protect myself and anybody else. You are responsible ultimately for the actions that you commit, but if it’s a life or death situation, that’s going to be a judgment call on that person.”


In the light of recent attempted robbery with a firearm, where the offender was thwarted by an armed driver, what is your stance on the personal ownership of guns for safety reasons?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Charles

    July 25, 2024 at 11:14 am

    What’s so ‘tragic’ about the robber being killed? Are you liberal?

  2. Deerslayer7

    July 25, 2024 at 12:42 pm

    One less Oxygen thief on the planet…

  3. Rod Roberts

    July 25, 2024 at 5:34 pm

    I’m usually armed also. If someone approached me with a weapon in hand, I would be ready to defend myself.

  4. Timothy

    July 25, 2024 at 7:49 pm

    Amerika has a thug problem. Those in gov’t. that write laws, are benefitting the thugs “allowed” to commit multiple crimes, while on the street. IT is the taxpayers that are the fools in this equation. Sane people chose to live in a RED, pro-safety, pro-gun state or city. Believe in the right to life.

  5. Terry

    July 26, 2024 at 4:52 am

    What with the persecution complex AGAINST victims defending them selves against crooks and robbers I can see why victims are leaving the scene. Especially on the LEFT coast and in many New England states. Law enforcement and the Courts scream about vigilantly activities, BUT when the police are actually allowed to do their jobs many courts release the perps with LITTLE or NO punishment and they end up back on the streets attacking citizens again!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Preparedness

Good Samaritan Saves Trooper in Harrowing Interstate Confrontation

Published

on

A recent incident on Interstate 49 in Rogers, Arkansas, has brought to light the dangers faced by state troopers and the critical role of Good Samaritans. On July 27, 26-year-old Guatemalan national Angel Zapet-Alvarado was recorded on dashcam video resisting arrest after being pulled over for driving at a staggering 114 miles per hour in heavy traffic.

Arkansas State Police released the dashcam footage on Wednesday, showing the tense moments that unfolded when Trooper Alexandria Duncan attempted to stop Zapet-Alvarado. Despite her emergency lights and sirens, he initially refused to pull over.

After finally stopping on the highway shoulder, Zapet-Alvarado continued to defy Duncan’s commands. Duncan observed his hand on the gearshift and took his keys to prevent him from fleeing. However, he resisted exiting the vehicle, prompting Duncan to deploy her taser.

The dashcam video captures Zapet-Alvarado’s persistent refusal to comply with Duncan’s orders to roll over and put his hands behind his back. In response, Duncan triggered the taser multiple times, causing Zapet-Alvarado to cry out in pain.

At one point, Zapet-Alvarado managed to wrestle the taser from Duncan and threw it into interstate traffic. He then escalated the confrontation by kicking Duncan’s head multiple times.

Amid the struggle, 31-year-old Kylie Sutton, a Good Samaritan, rushed to assist Duncan. Upon noticing Sutton, Duncan instructed her to retrieve the taser, which Sutton did. However, Zapet-Alvarado managed to get on top of Duncan.

Sutton intervened by grabbing Zapet-Alvarado from behind and moving him to the ground. Duncan then instructed Sutton to step back and warned Zapet-Alvarado that she would shoot if he continued to resist. When he did not comply, Duncan fired a single round, wounding him in the right temple.

Despite his injury, Zapet-Alvarado continued to resist arrest until another state trooper arrived to assist Duncan. Zapet-Alvarado was then transported to Mercy Hospital Northwest Arkansas for treatment before being released to law enforcement.

Toxicology reports revealed that Zapet-Alvarado’s blood-alcohol level was .16, twice the legal limit, and that cannabinoids were present in his system. He was subsequently taken to the Benton County Sheriff’s Office Detention Center and placed on hold for a Homeland Security Investigation.

Trooper Duncan sustained non-life-threatening injuries during the altercation and received medical treatment. The state police Criminal Investigation Division reviewed the case, and Benton County Prosecutor Joshua Robinson confirmed that Duncan’s use of deadly force was consistent with Arkansas law.

Col. Mike Hagar expressed his support for Trooper Duncan, stating, “I wholeheartedly support Trooper Duncan. We tell our troopers to trust their instincts and lean into their experience and training when they’re on the highways. Anyone who has walked in a trooper’s boots knows that trusting your gut keeps you safe so that you can protect and serve the public. In our world, hesitation can get you killed.”

Hagar also praised the bravery of both Duncan and Sutton, adding, “I thank God that he gave Alex the strength to survive that encounter, and that he put Kylie by her side when she needed support the most. I’m so proud of them both.”

This incident underscores the unpredictable and perilous nature of law enforcement duties and highlights the importance of community support in ensuring the safety of officers and the public.


How should citizens respond when witnessing a law enforcement officer in a physical altercation?

Watch footage of the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Robot Heroics: Texas Standoff Ends with High-Tech Takedown

Published

on

There’s a new high-tech hero in the realm of law enforcement. A police bomb squad robot recently played a pivotal role in subduing an armed suspect during a tense standoff in Texas.

The incident involved 39-year-old Felix Delarosa, who had a warrant out for his arrest due to a parole violation. According to KCBD, Delarosa had tampered with his electronic monitoring device.

Around 10 a.m. on a Wednesday, members of the Texas Anti-Gang unit located Delarosa at a Days Inn hotel in Lubbock. When officers attempted to approach him, Delarosa, who was armed, fired a shot from inside his hotel room.

In response, the officers called in the Lubbock County Sheriff’s SWAT team for assistance.

Negotiations with Delarosa proved challenging as he fired additional shots while barricaded in his room. Amid the exchange, the room’s large glass window was shattered.

To mitigate further risk to law enforcement, the Lubbock Regional Bomb Squad deployed a robot to handle the situation. The robot approached Delarosa’s hotel room, and the suspect attempted to disable it by throwing a bed sheet over it, which proved ineffective.

The robot advanced towards the broken window, prompting Delarosa to shoot at it. In a tactical move, the robot retaliated by deploying tear gas into the room.

Footage shows Delarosa crawling out of the room, visibly disoriented from the tear gas.

As he struggled on the ground, the robot maneuvered on top of him, pinning him down. During this action, the robot’s wheels inadvertently pulled down the suspect’s pants.

SWAT team members then swiftly moved in and apprehended Delarosa, concluding the two-hour standoff.

Following his capture, Delarosa was transported to University Medical Center for treatment of his injuries before being booked into the Lubbock County Detention Center.

He now faces charges of aggravated assault against a public servant.

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice noted that Delarosa had previously been sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2017 for manufacturing and delivering a controlled substance. He was released on parole in April 2022.

This incident demonstrates the growing role of technology in law enforcement, showcasing how robotic assistance can effectively and safely manage high-risk situations.


How do you feel about the use of advanced technology, such as bomb squad robots, in law enforcement situations involving armed suspects?

Watch a video about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Preparedness

Self-Defense Ruling in Detroit Tailgate Shooting Sparks Controversy

Published

on

A concealed carrier involved in a fatal incident at a Detroit Lions tailgate won’t face charges, as the Wayne County Prosecutor has declared the shooting an act of self-defense. The incident, which took place at the Eastern Market, was captured on cellphone video and involved a confrontation that escalated quickly.

Jalen Welch, the assailant, allegedly pulled a gun and threatened a 40-year-old man, who is a legal concealed pistol owner. In response, the 40-year-old fired a single shot that struck Welch in the head, fatally wounding him.

Tragically, the same bullet also hit an innocent bystander, RayShawn Palmer, who was also killed.

Wayne County Prosecutor Kym Worthy stated, “In this case, the shooter was not involved with the physical altercation, or any crime, when Mr. Welch pulled out his weapon and threatened him with deadly force.”

“It is only then that the shooter drew his weapon and fired one-time striking Mr. Welch, and unfortunately striking Mr. Palmer,” Worthy added. “A thorough review of the facts and evidence shows that the shooter acted in lawful self-defense. The shooting was justified. There is insufficient evidence to charge the shooter with any crime.”

The shooter’s attorney expressed relief over the decision.

“My client is very pleased he is not being charged with a crime; it was agonizing sitting in jail for three days awaiting the decision,” the attorney told WJBK-TV.

“He is dealing with a lot of emotions. He feels terrible for the family of the bystander and wishes to extend his condolences, but he is grateful to return to his family. His right to exercise to protect his life and others is absolute. He did nothing to forfeit that right.”

Despite the ruling, Palmer’s family is devastated and angry that no charges are being filed against the shooter.

“This is unbelievable that an individual shoots someone — even though he had a CPL — in an environment like this,” said Jermaine Little, Palmer’s brother. “It could have been a 5-year-old. Unfortunately, it was my brother, and so my whole family is here. We are grieving. We are hurt, and we want some answers.”

Little continued, “Our brother’s gone. This is an individual that wanted to give back, did give back, loved his family, was not a violent person, loved to dance. Just wanted to entertain and for this to happen, for trying to stop something that was happening, it’s unacceptable.”

Palmer’s family has vowed to challenge the no-charges ruling.

“We’re not going to give up,” Little noted. “If we got to get out here every day, if we got to post things, if we got to march — whatever we got to do. We just want some answers. Give us some answers.”

This incident highlights the complexities and emotional toll of self-defense cases, especially when innocent lives are lost.


What is your primary concern regarding incidents involving concealed carry and self-defense?

Watch a local news report about the incident below:

Let us know what you think, please share your thoughts in the comments below.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

" "